An Overview of Europe’s Opinion on Brexit – 13th June 2016

Although most European newspapers and columnists would prefer Britain to remain within the European Union, some of them are beginning to sense that getting rid of an unpredictable and unwilling partner could be an opportunity for those willing to move on towards further integration – despite the risk of others following London’s trail.



Credit: Tom, Trouw (Netherlands)


“Behind the scenes everyone is quaking at the thought of the 'unthinkable'”, writes Thomas Mayer in Austrian daily Der Standard. According to the columnist, the EU is currently so unpopular in the UK that its top officials avoid to show up in Britain or to speak publicly in favor of Remain. As for the European governments it’s even worse: Mayer believes that they “have a lot of good reasons for wanting to keep London in; but”, he adds, “they behave like they couldn’t care less whatever the result is.”

In some countries, however, Brexit is seen as an opportunity rather than an issue. Like in Poland, as Marek A. Chicocki writes in the Conservative daily Rzeczpospolita: “A Brexit would by no means spell the end for the Union but simply pave the way for its thorough overhaul. Poland is the biggest country outside the Eurozone, meaning that it would like to assume a more important role within the EU. So”, he concludes, “let us not regard a Brexit as a disaster but as a chance to bring our own ideas into this restructuring of the EU” – if the EU survives, of course. Which would be all but certain according to Bernardo Valli. In Rome’s La Repubblica, the veteran columnist writes that a country leaving the EU “would shake the whole system”: “It’s easy to figure that, after Brexit Marine Le Pen will ask for Frexit. That would give her campaign for next year’s presidential election an extraordinary boost. In Europe, movements that are allied or under the influence of Le Pen’s Front National would be eager to follow her example.”

Some commentators consider that playing the scaremongering as the “In” camp is doing is counter-productive. Like Ferreira Fernandes, a columnist within Portuguese daily Diario de Notícias, who believes that Bremainers “may be right” when they talk about “the economic disaster that would ensue, the disinterest of Arab and Chinese investors and an isolated City of London and the retaliatory measures from Brussels” should the “Out” win. But they “should also be able to present other convincing arguments, like political and cultural interests or Europe’s common destiny” – a point in which,  Bremainers “apparently don't really believe in themselves.” On an opposite position, Le Mondethinks that Prime Minister David Cameron’s tactics of “smashing Brexit under a carpet bombing of reports every time more alarming…seems to work”. But the “In” needs to “keep the discussion on the economy” and should not “drift into immigration”. And even if it wins on the 23 June, troubles might not be over for the EU, as Mr Cameron “will want to foist his political agenda on Europe, with a revival of the single market, a de-bureaucratisation of the EU and a more active role for national parliaments.” And, – something Paris might not be happy with – reinforce economic convergence between Germany and the UK.”

A few European publications took a stance on the referendum. Among them, Der Spiegel even had two different covers: one in German saying “Bitte geht nicht!”, another one in English saying “Please don’t go!”. “If Britain is clever, it will remain a member of the EU, because it will recognise that the future of the west is at stake. If Britain is clever, it will realise that it is not a world power on its own, that it will lose much with a yes to Brexit on June 23, and gain nothing but a brief moment of pride”, writes Hamburg’s magazine. But should Britain vote to leave, “because a disproportionately high number of older and less well-educated British want it so passionately, Germany and the rest of Europe will have to accept that today's EU is dysfunctional and unattractive. The EU should then mourn the loss of departed Britain and learn from it, and it should cease giving humiliating gifts to those who have left and develop some resolution.”

And Berlin’s strong stance on avoiding Brexit by any means is explained by its concern that it “would lead to a breakdown of the project of Eropean integration”, says Dutch magazine Elsevier, according to which, “the traditional ‘big three’ of the EU (Germany, France and the UK) could be out of balance if the UK were to leave. Germany fears that this could lead to a surge in power for France and that other countries would want to follow the British example.” What’s more, Elsevier adds, “the European Central Bank considers Brexit as a threat, both for the Union and the UK itself.”

From time to time we'll share exclusive interview clips (including never-seen-before footage), the most incisive blog posts and the most interesting dispatches from our event organisers as they take the europe debate to the furthest, biggest, smallest, weirdest, most unusual places around europe and beyond.

Sign up to the Newsletter

Share this

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
Stay in touch Get our Newsletter


Free Word Centre
60 Farringdon Road
London EC1R 3GA


The Wake up Foundation is a registered charity no. 1152894

Donate now

Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.

Created with NationBuilder

X Close

Join Wake Up Europe!

Wake Up Europe is a campaign brought to you by the Wake Up Foundation. It was sparked by the themes explored in The Great European Disaster Movie by Annalisa Piras and Bill Emmott.

We believe in the values that inspired the European project but that this project isn't working. Europe is sleep-walking towards disaster. We must wake up Europe so that we can save Europe from itself.

This job is too important to be left to the elites, the media, the political parties alone: ordinary people must be encouraged to discuss what Europe they want to see.

Or support us another way

Donate Host an event