Jon Danzig is an award-winning investigative journalist specialising in health, human rights and the European Union

Eurosceptics often claim that they love Europe, but hate the European Union. They assert that Britain can still be part of Europe without having to be part of the European Union. 

That, of course, is true to an extent, but it rather misses the point and purpose of the EU.

The European Economic Community – later to be called the European Union – was started in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War, with the express intent of avoiding wars on our continent ever happening again. 

That was the passionate resolve of those who are regarded as the eleven founders of the European Union, including our own war leader, Winston Churchill. 

After all, Europe had a long and bloody history of resolving its differences through war, and indeed, the planet’s two world wars originated right here, on our continent.

So the EU was never just an economic agreement between nations. It was always also meant to be a social and political union of European nations to enable them to find ways not just to trade together, but to co-exist and co-operate in harmony and peace on many levels as a community of nations. 

The goal, in the founding document of the European Union called the Treaty of Rome, was to achieve ‘ever closer union among the peoples of Europe’ (which is rather different to ‘ever closer union of nations’.)


'A kind of United States of Europe'

Just one year after the Second World War, in 1946, Winston Churchill made his famous speech in Zurich, Switzerland in which he said:

“We must build a kind of United States of Europe. The structure of the United States of Europe, if well and truly built, will be such as to make the material strength of a single state less important.. 

“If at first all the States of Europe are not willing or able to join the Union, we must nevertheless proceed to assemble and combine those who will and those who can.”

And in August 1949, at the first meeting of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, Churchill delivered his speech in French and said:

“There is no reason for us not to succeed in achieving our goal and laying the foundation of a United Europe. 

"A Europe whose moral design will win the respect and acknowledgement of all humanity, and whose physical strength will be such that no person will dare to disturb it as it marches peacefully towards the future.”

At the time Churchill did not envisage Britain joining the new Union of Europe, but he was later to change his mind. 


'We genuinely wish to join'

In early 1957 the European Economic Community (EEC) was established by its six founding nations, France, Italy, West Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands and Luxembourg. 

This was a remarkable achievement, considering that these countries only a few years previously had been fighting in a most terrible war, and four of the founding nations had been viciously subjugated by another of the founders, Germany, during their Nazi regime. 

In a speech four months later in July 1957 at Westminster’s Central Hall, Churchill welcomed the formation of the EEC by the six, provided that "the whole of free Europe will have access". Churchill added, "we genuinely wish to join".

But Churchill also warned:

“If, on the other hand, the European trade community were to be permanently restricted to the six nations, the results might be worse than if nothing were done at all – worse for them as well as for us. It would tend not to unite Europe but to divide it – and not only in the economic field.” 

In August 1961, Churchill wrote to his constituency Chairman, "I think that the Government are right to apply to join the European Economic Community.." And just two years before he died, in 1963, Churchill wrote, "The future of Europe if Britain were to be excluded is black indeed."

Maybe this is the point that many in the ‘Leave EU’ campaigns simply don’t get. Here in Britain we don’t seem to understand the founding principles of the European Union – and on the rest of the continent, they don’t understand why we don’t understand. 

The European Union isn't just about trade, and never was. It’s about peace, and a community of nations of our continent working together for the benefit and protection of its citizens.

Although NATO protected us from external threats, the European Union has stopped us from going to war with each other. That’s a huge accomplishment for a continent that was previously more used to employing violence as the way to settle disagreements.

Just a trade arrangement?

Many Eurosceptics often claim that in the first referendum all those years ago, Britain was misled into thinking that the ‘Common Market’ was just a trade arrangement with the rest of Europe. But that’s not true. I was there. The discussion was dominated – especially by the NO campaign – about political union with Europe.


So, when Britain threatens to walk away from the European Union, we are doing much more than a possible move away from ‘free trade’ with each other. We are snubbing our European allies and partners on something that they seem much more passionate about than us. 

We are telling them that we don’t want to be part of an exceptionally special and precious community that goes way beyond the considerations of trade and economics.

Jon Danzig’s other articles can be found at www.articles.eyesears.com and his work can be followed on Facebook at www.facebook.com/JonDanzigWrites and on Twitter @Jon_Danzig


From time to time we'll share exclusive interview clips (including never-seen-before footage), the most incisive blog posts and the most interesting dispatches from our event organisers as they take the europe debate to the furthest, biggest, smallest, weirdest, most unusual places around europe and beyond.

Sign up to the Newsletter



Share this

Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2017-09-01 12:13:41 +0100
    A good article thanks. The problem with the Brits is we pretended that it was all about trade. To an extent we were deceived by politicians as to it being a political project, but mostly we allowed ourselves to be deceived and we deceived ourselves. The irony here is that the Leave supports tended to see the political project most clearly. They were hostile to it and in many cases paranoid about it but they saw it as political whereas Remain’s arguments were all about the trade and economic benefits and the costs and risks of leaving those behind. These arguments were almost completely right but they missed the point and were lost on their opponents who prioritised sovereignty. I voted leave not because I am against trade or migration or friendly cooperation but because I simply did not and do no believe that political integration (with a federal United States of Europe as its ultimate goal) is needed for peace and prosperity and that even if it is then it needs to be conducted with the full informed consent to the people and could be done much better than the EU is managing to do it. Also it was about identity. For whatever reason I have never felt especially European, part of my identity is smaller than Europe and part of my identity is broader than Europe, but it strikes me as odd to adopt an identity which is broader and more open than “little Englander” but to stop that broadening of outlook when you reach the Caucus mountains. We all have overlapping circles of identity, and I can draw circles on a map which include England and Wales; the UK, Denmark and Norway and Sweden; The UK, France and Spain; The UK, Ireland, Canada and the USA, The UK, Pakistan and India; or the whole world and feel that I belong to some extent within that circle, but I find it hard to think of one which includes Austria but not Australia, Italy but not India, Ireland but not the USA, Sweden but not Norway. Despite being born into the EU, it never became part of my identity. To be open minded beyond your own country is good, but when you achieve that by simply changing the definition of your tribe from “British” to “European” then it is still tribalism with the same racist connotations which come with tribalism. I do get a feeling that that is what the other two EU major powers have done. Germany, has embraced its European identity because of a reluctance to embrace its German identity due to history and France has embraced its European identity was bulwark against US-led globalisation.

    The idea that the EU is the only way to achieve peace is not supported by evidence. Have you noticed that Canada has not been at war with the USA despite declining to join the federation of states to the South. My wish for the UK is that it will become to the EU what Canada is to the USA. A good friend, an ally, and a partner in trade and culture, but that it will remain an independent country able to act differently as and when it sees fit (and we are seeing it doing so at the moment to its advantage).

    Noone regards Canadians as racist or thick or bigots in refusing to join the USA. Even if there was a compelling economic advantage in doing so Canada would still wish to remain a sovereign state. As a Leaver I had not appreciated just how much the EU meant to some Remainers and articles like yours help me understand that it is really about how you see your identity which is why it is so personal. The same of course if true of Leavers, we want out of the EU because it is not part of our identity. We have identities which are narrower or broader (and for most of us of course we have multiple identities some narrow and broad) but very little which is congruent with the EU borders. We don’t want to rebuild the British Empire, but our experience of Empire, or rather the dismantling of Empire and in may cases subsequent thriving of the constituent parts are viewed as a model for our departure from the nascent EU empire.
  • commented 2016-04-10 10:11:07 +0100
    exceptional text, I enjoyed the production of this because of the rich coldness in detail. liftx para mulheres sem marcas http://lift-x.doodlekit.com/
  • commented 2016-03-03 19:12:58 +0000
    Strange it seems a lot of our European allies are ready to follow Britain OUT..
Stay in touch Get our Newsletter

Address

info@thewakeupfoundation.eu

Free Word Centre
60 Farringdon Road
London EC1R 3GA

About

The Wake up Foundation is a registered charity no. 1152894

Donate now

Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.

Created with NationBuilder

X Close

Join Wake Up Europe!

Wake Up Europe is a campaign brought to you by the Wake Up Foundation. It was sparked by the themes explored in The Great European Disaster Movie by Annalisa Piras and Bill Emmott.

We believe in the values that inspired the European project but that this project isn't working. Europe is sleep-walking towards disaster. We must wake up Europe so that we can save Europe from itself.

This job is too important to be left to the elites, the media, the political parties alone: ordinary people must be encouraged to discuss what Europe they want to see.


Or support us another way

Donate Host an event